Medicaid expansion, a cornerstone of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), has reshaped healthcare access for low-income Americans. As Congress considers a budget resolution that could slash Medicaid funding by $880 billion over the next decade, the future of this program hangs in the balance. Public opinion, as reflected in recent surveys, shows strong resistance to reducing Medicaid funds, particularly the enhanced federal support for expansion enrollees. This article explores five critical aspects of Medicaid expansion, highlighting its reach, benefits, and the potential consequences of proposed policy changes.
1. Broad Adoption Across Political Lines
The ACA’s Medicaid expansion extends coverage to adults earning up to 138% of the Federal Poverty Level ($21,597 for an individual in 2025), with the federal government covering 90% of costs through an enhanced federal matching rate (FMAP). A 2012 Supreme Court decision made expansion optional for states, and as of April 2025, 41 states, including Washington, D.C., have implemented it. These states are nearly evenly divided between those that supported Trump (21) and Harris (20) in the 2024 election, demonstrating bipartisan appeal.
Since its inception, expansion has grown steadily. In 2014, 27 states adopted it, followed by 14 more, with North Carolina and South Dakota joining in 2023. Most states passed expansion through legislation, but seven used voter-driven ballot initiatives. By June 2024, over 20 million people—about 25% of total Medicaid enrollees and 31% in expansion states—were covered. The expansion has reduced uninsured rates, improved access to care, and boosted state economies and healthcare providers. Studies associate it with better health outcomes, such as earlier cancer detection and lower mortality from chronic illnesses. Surveys indicate that 66% of residents in non-expansion states favor adopting it to cover more uninsured low-income individuals.
2. Higher Spending and Eligibility in Expansion States
States that expanded Medicaid spend more per enrollee across all groups compared to non-expansion states. For instance, expansion states allocate $25,170 per enrollee with disabilities, nearly 2.5 times the $10,494 in non-expansion states. They also spend $6,001 per child enrollee, compared to $4,295 elsewhere. Spending on expansion adults exceeds that for other adults and children but is lower than for seniors or disabled enrollees. This challenges arguments that expansion siphons resources from other groups, as expansion states invest more overall.
Expansion states also set higher income eligibility thresholds: 266% of FPL for children (versus 234% in non-expansion states), 213% for pregnant individuals (versus 203%), and 138% for parents (versus 33%). These differences stem from state policies on benefits, payment rates, and regional cost variations. Policies for seniors and disabled individuals vary widely and are less tied to expansion status.
3. A Lifeline for Women and Older Adults
Medicaid expansion covers adults aged 19–64, many of whom work in low-wage jobs without employer-sponsored insurance. It is a vital pathway for 38% of women aged 19–49 enrolled in Medicaid, enabling pre-pregnancy care that reduces pregnancy complications. In expansion states, 59% of pregnant individuals are enrolled before pregnancy, compared to 26% in non-expansion states, where eligibility gaps are wider. Expansion ensures continuous coverage post-pregnancy and encourages child enrollment through a “welcome mat” effect, where parents’ coverage boosts children’s participation in Medicaid or CHIP.
Older adults also benefit significantly: 63% of Medicaid enrollees aged 50–64 rely on expansion. This group, often grappling with chronic conditions, depends on Medicaid before becoming eligible for Medicare, addressing gaps in coverage for those with limited workplace insurance options.
4. Supporting Chronic Condition Management
About 44% of expansion enrollees have at least one chronic condition, including 33% with physical health issues and 24% with behavioral health conditions. Among all Medicaid enrollees with chronic conditions, 53% are covered through expansion. Physical conditions increase with age—57% of enrollees aged 50–64 have one, compared to 16% of those aged 19–26—while behavioral health conditions remain consistent across ages (19–26%).
Expansion improves access to care for behavioral and physical health conditions, enhancing outcomes and supporting workforce participation. It covers 395,000 enrollees (2%) who use long-term care services and is the primary Medicaid pathway for people with HIV. By addressing costly health needs, expansion prevents financial hardship for those who might otherwise lack affordable care.
5. Risks of Proposed Policy Changes
Congress is exploring options to cut Medicaid spending, such as imposing work requirements or reducing the 90% FMAP for expansion. Work requirements, previously approved in some states, could save $109 billion over a decade but increase uninsurance without raising employment, as most enrollees already work. Reducing federal funding would shift costs to states, forcing difficult choices: abandoning expansion, finding alternative coverage, cutting other programs, or raising taxes. Twelve states have laws to end expansion if federal funding drops below 90%, and others, like Ohio and South Dakota, are considering similar measures.
If all states ended expansion, Medicaid enrollment could decline by 19% to 49% across states. Enrollees earning 100–138% FPL could access Marketplace subsidies, but those below 100% FPL would face a “coverage gap,” becoming uninsured unless eligible through other pathways. This could swell the 1.4 million adults already in the gap in non-expansion states. Losing coverage would increase medical debt, reduce preventive care, and worsen chronic disease outcomes, with ripple effects like reduced child enrollment.
Medicaid expansion has enrolled over 20 million low-income Americans, delivering health and economic benefits across diverse states. Its higher spending and eligibility thresholds in expansion states reflect a commitment to comprehensive coverage, particularly for women, older adults, and those with chronic conditions. However, proposed federal cuts threaten to unravel these gains, risking coverage for millions and exacerbating health disparities. Public support for maintaining Medicaid funding underscores its importance. As policy debates unfold, the stakes for low-income Americans and state budgets are immense.
Note: Data derived from analyses of Medicaid enrollment, spending, and health outcomes, including 2021 T-MSIS files and CMS Medicaid Budget and Expenditure System.
Source: https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/5-key-facts-about-medicaid-expansion/
Discover more from Doctor Trusted
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
