The Hidden Minefield in Your Medical Billing Contract 

By Edita Petrosyan, Billing Department, WCH

Percentage-based fees are the industry default. In most of the country, they’re also legally questionable — or outright banned. Here’s what every provider and third-party biller needs to know before signing anything. 

Every medical practice that outsources its revenue cycle to a third-party billing company has signed some version of the same document: a billing services agreement. Most providers skim it. Many sign it the same day they receive it. And nearly all of them have no idea that a single clause buried in the fees section may expose them to regulatory liability, license suspension, or government investigation. 

That clause is the percentage-based billing arrangement — the industry-standard structure where the biller receives a cut, typically 4–10%, of everything collected on the provider’s behalf. It aligns incentives, the argument goes. The biller works harder when the upside is shared. 

The problem is that more than two-thirds of U.S. states have laws that treat this arrangement as fee-splitting — and fee-splitting between a licensed medical professional and a non-physician is, in many jurisdictions, a form of professional misconduct. 


Discover more from Doctor Trusted

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Discover more from Doctor Trusted

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading