Dr. Sadik Bizanti didn’t set out to become a physician — a game of cards decided that for him. Today he leads MedKick, a physician-led company built around a deceptively simple idea: chronically ill Medicare patients don’t need another quarterly checkup, they need someone checking in every month. In this conversation, he talks about the friends who ended up in medicine with him, the ACO job in Miami that reshaped his thinking, why MedKick caps its nurse caseloads, and the near-misses that almost ended the company before it started.
On becoming a doctor almost by accident
I was born in Oklahoma and grew up in Libya. I wanted to be an engineer, not a doctor. One night, eleven of us — seven playing, four watching — were playing UNO. I lost. The loser became the doctor. Out of that same group, eleven of us are now practicing medicine across five continents. Growing up in Libya and ending up with friends scattered across the world taught me that healthcare isn’t one system — it’s dozens of different approaches to the same human problem. That’s part of why MedKick is built to scale past any single practice or region.
On the moment the system’s cracks became clear
My brother was Chief Resident in Baltimore — my own residency was surgical, in Tripoli. The real turning point for me came later, in Miami, working as medical director for an ACO. That’s where I saw the gap firsthand: between what insurers pay for, what Medicare risk adjustment actually captures, and what patients really need.
On finding the patients who need help most
We talk about the top 20% of high-risk Medicare patients who drive 80% of resource utilization — but identifying them isn’t about a single visit, it’s a composite score. We look at medication count, number of active chronic conditions, hospitalizations over the trailing 24 months, recent ER and specialist visits, total cost of care over three years, PMPM cost trend, and a few additional proprietary factors. A single primary care visit only sees a snapshot. This approach sees the trend — and the trend is what actually predicts who’s about to have a bad outcome.
On why good CMS programs go unused
Remote Patient Monitoring, Chronic Care Management, and Principal Care Management all existed before MedKick. The problem was implementation: most practices either don’t know these programs exist, or can’t justify building them internally — hiring staff, building compliant protocols, tracking time, submitting claims correctly every month. Even a good practice often finds the ROI isn’t there alone. So we built a company around doing only this, at volume. The margin per practice is thin, but it compounds across hundreds — eventually thousands — of them.
On documentation and technology
Our tools keep evolving, now including AI, all on compliant, encrypted infrastructure. It used to be dictation tools like Dragon. Now it’s AI-assisted tools that keep documentation accurate, capture the patient interaction, and make sure the evidence of care holds up under audit.
On stepping back from the operating room
Leaving direct practice was hard at first. What settled it for me: as a surgeon, I could touch maybe 3,000 patients a year. Running MedKick, I can touch 300,000 — and eventually a million. I stay clinically current through conferences and ongoing reading on treatment approaches across the conditions we manage.
On why the nurse-to-patient ratio is non-negotiable
We cap it at roughly 200 patients per nurse. That’s what lets each nurse give real, monthly attention and build genuine trust. Nurses build relationships with the same patients over time — during the holidays, some patients call the after-hours line just to wish their nurse a happy holiday, because they feel like family.
On what healthcare could look like in ten years
Chronic and elderly Medicare patients would get consistent monthly contact instead of a checkup once a quarter. Fewer avoidable ER visits and hospitalizations, because problems get caught before they escalate. Care becomes proactive instead of reactive.
On avoiding becoming part of the problem
Healthcare has real problems with hidden fees and misaligned incentives. Where we sit in that landscape: physician-led, transparent, and paid for outcomes tied to real patient contact — not volume games. The way we make sure we don’t become another version of the problem: clinical decisions stay physician-led, not investor-led.
On the hardest stretch
Early on, there were stretches where cash was tight and we had to make hard calls just to keep the team together. What kept me going was a simple mindset: every problem is just an equation to solve, not a reason to shut down. You learn not to repeat the same mistake twice.
On why physician-led and privately held, specifically
Physician-led, because clinical decisions shouldn’t be made by people without clinical judgment. Privately held, because it lets us make long-term decisions for patient care instead of managing to a quarterly return. Both were deliberate choices, not defaults.
On what he’d change
My hiring process. Early on, it wasn’t structured enough — I didn’t have a real system for identifying the right talent. That’s something I built and got sharper on over time.
On answering the skeptics
Critics say remote monitoring and care management are just another billing code opportunity dressed up as innovation. My honest answer: if a patient is touched at the right time and gets real value every month, the model is legitimate. If it’s just a mechanism to bill, it isn’t. Our rule is simple — treat every patient like your own mom or dad. Do the right thing, and don’t obsess over the money. It follows.
On resistant physicians
I remind them: we went from paper charts to EMRs, and practices are now penalized for not using one — healthcare keeps moving. Then I ask a simple question: how much staff would you need to reach every patient every month yourself? A 15-minute appointment doesn’t leave room for that.
On what changed how he thinks
Travel. Visiting hospitals in different countries changes how you see healthcare — Canada leans into primary care, Sweden is ahead on tech, the UK’s NHS has its own pressures. Watching how each system solves the same problem shapes how I think about closing access gaps here. But the bigger shift for me has been listening — realizing a patient’s loneliness or anxiety matters just as much as their chronic conditions.
Discover more from Doctor Trusted
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
